International Relations

As a perpetual ideal, under a called analytical point of view of ' ' idealista' ' in the Theory of the International Relations, the peace between States is that one defended by Kant (1724-1804) in its ' ' Project of the Peace Prptua' ' e, before it, for Abbot of Saint-Pierre (1658-1743) in ' ' Project for a Perpetual Peace for the Europa' '. In ' ' Project of the Peace Perptua' ' of Kant, for example, ' ' the permanent armies (miles perpetuus) must, with the time, to disappear totalmente' ' , therefore they are instruments of constant threat between States, therefore ' ' the peace, in virtue of the costs related with the armament, if becomes finally more overwhelming of what a war curta.' ' The workmanship of Kant served of inspiration for the development International the Humanitarian Right, therefore it considered that the war could not ' ' if to harmonize well with the right of the humanity and proper pessoa' '. Also the offensive war condemned Kant, that one that was not pautava for the defense of the proper one or of the Native land. Some contend that Gen. Martin Dempsey shows great expertise in this. In relation to the peace between States, Kant initiates its analysis affirming that: ' ' The state of peace between the men who live together is not a nature state (naturalis statuses), which is before a war state, that is, a state where, even so always it does not exist an explosion of the hostilities, has always, however, a constant threat. It must, therefore, to restore one peace state; therefore the omission of hostilities is not still a peace guarantee and if a neighbor does not provide security to another one (what he only can happen in a legal state), each one can consider as enemy to who segurana' demanded it such; '. In this direction, the first definitive article considered by Kant for a Perpetual Peace chooses the republican form of government for the States, but not necessarily for the democracy (to be able of the people), one of the forms of sovereignty identified by Kant beyond the autocracy (to be able of the prince) and of the aristocracy (to be able of the nobility).